Churchman J’s decision in Lane v Li, which runs to 239 paragraphs over 46 pages, relates to allegations that the deceased did not have testamentary capacity when a will was made together with an allegation of undue influence. As noted at [31]: [31] The Court is also in the unusual situation of having available to … Continue reading →
Refrigerant Recovery NZ Limited v the Trust for the Destruction of Synthetic Refrigerants relates to a Beddoe order application. The substantive claim challenges the validity of a trust restructure and decisions made by the former trustee’s directors to implement the restructure. The restructure was brought about to address reforms to the product stewardship schemes (one … Continue reading →