//
archives

Trusts

This category contains 250 posts

Waiver and variation under the Trusts Act and the inherent jurisdiction

Re Candida Trust provides practical guidance as to the scope of section 125 of the Trusts Act 2019 and the use of the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to permit trustees to sign a new restated trust deed that incorporates varied terms. Background facts Waiver pursuant to section 125 of the Trusts Act As set out … Continue reading

Real and substantial connection

The background facts of NZ Trust Corporation Ltd v Bonnard Lawson Geneve SA & Ors are set out by Associate Judge Gardiner at [1] to [4] as follows: The issues for the Court to determined can be summarised as whether: The following time-line sets out key events that have lead to the proceedings before the … Continue reading

Beneficiary Hostility

In New Zealand Beddoe applications are governed in the first instance by the High Court Rules, which do not extend to prospective costs orders by beneficiaries. Representation of VG Trustee Limited re the B Trust (Re the B Trust) considers whether beneficiaries should have their costs met on account of a successful Beddoe application brought … Continue reading

Too late

The Supreme Court has denied leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision in McLaughlin v McLaughlin, which relates to a long-standing challenge regarding the trusteeship of a family trust and allegations of breaches of trust brought by brothers of one of the trustees. The original causes of action were: John McLaughlin retired before the conclusion … Continue reading

Unhelpfully silent

Worksafe New Zealand MHI Haumaru Aotearoa v RH & Jury Trust & Ors (Worksafe v Jury) relates to a tragic and fatal accident where a young child visiting his grandfather at work on a dairy farm died after his jacket was caught in an exposed rotating shaft. As noted at [4]: Fundamentally, Worksafe v Jury … Continue reading

It’s not just about the money

Re Borthwick relates to an application by trustees to enter into a settlement agreement and to make the necessary variations of trust to effect the agreement. The background of the matter features a trust restructure that was challenged by a disaffected beneficiary. The application before the court calls upon the court’s supervisory capacity pursuant to section 124 … Continue reading

A debt is not a nuptial settlement

Smale v Lowe & Ors relates to an application for summary judgment for the repayment of loans between family trusts. As set out at [1] to [2]: A number of matters were put to the court by Mr Lowe who was not open to repayment of the debt owing to the Anzac Trustees. Are the deeds … Continue reading

Deadlock?

In Jongeneel v Schaake Powell J traverses the parameters of deadlock that would support the Court exercising powers to remove existing trustees and appoint a replacement trustee pursuant to sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019, By way of background Ms Jongeneel and Mr Schaake settled the J A G and A J … Continue reading

Fairness to all beneficiaries

The key facts of Tata v Abrams are set out in [2] of the judgment as follows: … Donna and Reginald’s mother, Violet Tata (Violet), passed away on 19 March 2008. Donna was one of two executors appointed under Violet’s Will. The other executor, Ms Judy Kaka, passed away in 2016. Donna assumed responsibility for … Continue reading

Rational

Wallace v Wallace relates to a decision of the trustees of the Ione Wallace Trust (the Trust) to bring forward the Trust’s vesting date. As set out at [4]: “The trustees wish to bring forward the vesting date and distribute the funds they currently hold to the six final beneficiaries named in the Trust. One … Continue reading

Categories

Archives