//
archives

Trusts Act

This category contains 31 posts

ADR guidance

In Wiggins v Wiggins the court explores the parameters of section 145 of the Trusts Act, which provide that the Court, may, at the request of a Trustee or a beneficiary or on its own motion, submit any internal matter to an ADR process other than in the situation where the terms of the Trust … Continue reading

Waiver and variation under the Trusts Act and the inherent jurisdiction

Re Candida Trust provides practical guidance as to the scope of section 125 of the Trusts Act 2019 and the use of the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to permit trustees to sign a new restated trust deed that incorporates varied terms. Background facts Waiver pursuant to section 125 of the Trusts Act As set out … Continue reading

Declaration of bare trust

Re Estate of Witchall relates to four blocks of land held by a company removed from the Register of Companies pursuant to the Companies Act 1955. As noted at [3] to [5]: The company in question could not be reinstated to the Register of Companies as there the Companies Act 1993 does not provide for … Continue reading

Self-dealing by trustee – grounds for removal

Cain v Martin relates to wide ranging proceedings regarding the proper administration of the Tolemac Trust following several years of disharmony following the settlor’s death. The most recent proceedings relate to the removal of one of the two trustees due to concerns regarding proper disclosure regarding trust assets and an unauthorised distribution to a trustee … Continue reading

Beneficiary Hostility

In New Zealand Beddoe applications are governed in the first instance by the High Court Rules, which do not extend to prospective costs orders by beneficiaries. Representation of VG Trustee Limited re the B Trust (Re the B Trust) considers whether beneficiaries should have their costs met on account of a successful Beddoe application brought … Continue reading

It’s not just about the money

Re Borthwick relates to an application by trustees to enter into a settlement agreement and to make the necessary variations of trust to effect the agreement. The background of the matter features a trust restructure that was challenged by a disaffected beneficiary. The application before the court calls upon the court’s supervisory capacity pursuant to section 124 … Continue reading

Deadlock?

In Jongeneel v Schaake Powell J traverses the parameters of deadlock that would support the Court exercising powers to remove existing trustees and appoint a replacement trustee pursuant to sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019, By way of background Ms Jongeneel and Mr Schaake settled the J A G and A J … Continue reading

Fairness to all beneficiaries

The key facts of Tata v Abrams are set out in [2] of the judgment as follows: … Donna and Reginald’s mother, Violet Tata (Violet), passed away on 19 March 2008. Donna was one of two executors appointed under Violet’s Will. The other executor, Ms Judy Kaka, passed away in 2016. Donna assumed responsibility for … Continue reading

Rational

Wallace v Wallace relates to a decision of the trustees of the Ione Wallace Trust (the Trust) to bring forward the Trust’s vesting date. As set out at [4]: “The trustees wish to bring forward the vesting date and distribute the funds they currently hold to the six final beneficiaries named in the Trust. One … Continue reading

Disclosure beyond beneficiaries

The Trusts Act 2019 introduced a presumption that trustees will provide basic trust information to every beneficiary and will provide further information on request. Before doing so, trustees must consider the factors set out in section 53 of the Trusts Act. Importantly, there is a procedure in section 54 of the Trusts Act where no … Continue reading

Categories

Archives