//
archives

Trusts Act

This category contains 43 posts

Originating considerations

The decisions in Francis v Fishbowl Trustee Stanley Limited both include applications for leave to commence proceedings by originating application. In Francis v Fishbowl, where the substantive proceedings relate to the appointment of a receiver under section 138 of the Trusts Act 2019 the application was not granted. The background to this matter is expressed … Continue reading →

Spirit of will not binding on trustees

Sherwin v JKA Holdings Limited & Ors relates to the Douglas Hilton Family Trust (the Trust), which was settled in 1985 by Dr Douglas Sherwin’s mother on terms that infer that Dr Sherwin, who was the source of the trust’s economic wealth, was the true settlor. This is addressed by Becroft J at [15] as … Continue reading →

All power to the settlors

In Queenin v Queenin the Court was asked to determine whether a trustee had been properly removed and for the court to review the exercise of appointor and trustee powers. The context of the application was the settlors’ decision to wind up the trust as the settlors did not consider the trust was still necessary. … Continue reading →

Honest reckoning

The current decision in the long-running case of Addleman v Lambie Trustee Limited & Ors relates primarily to whether the Court should order that the parties attend mediation pursuant to section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019. An appendix to the above decision (copied below) sets out a summary of Mrs Addleman’s concerns regarding the … Continue reading →

Necessary or desirable to remove trustees

In Gallagher-Dekker v Gallagher Anderson J carefully traverses the matters the Court will take into consideration when deciding whether trustees of a testamentary trust should be removed and replaced with a professional trustee. By way of background: Sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019 provide that the Court may remove a trustee and/or … Continue reading →

New is not a reason not to…

As noted at [91] in Gatfield v Hinton: By way of wider observation in Gatfield v Hinton, Associate Judge Lester traverses the matters that will be taken into consideration when the Court is considering whether a matter should be referred to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) pursuant to section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019. Relevantly … Continue reading →

Two step process to review trustee decision

Sections 126 and 127 of the Trusts Act provide for the review of trustee decisions.   The scope and relevant procedure are as follows: As noted by Churchman J in Paton v Acropolis Holdings Limited[1]at [54] the review of a trustee decision is a two stage process: first the beneficiary must produce evidence that establishes a … Continue reading →

ADR guidance

In Wiggins v Wiggins the court explores the parameters of section 145 of the Trusts Act, which provide that the Court, may, at the request of a Trustee or a beneficiary or on its own motion, submit any internal matter to an ADR process other than in the situation where the terms of the Trust … Continue reading →

Waiver and variation under the Trusts Act and the inherent jurisdiction

Re Candida Trust provides practical guidance as to the scope of section 125 of the Trusts Act 2019 and the use of the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to permit trustees to sign a new restated trust deed that incorporates varied terms. Background facts the Candida Trust (the Trust) will vest in the settlor’s children Stephanie, … Continue reading →

Declaration of bare trust

Re Estate of Witchall relates to four blocks of land held by a company removed from the Register of Companies pursuant to the Companies Act 1955. As noted at [3] to [5]: The company in question could not be reinstated to the Register of Companies as there the Companies Act 1993 does not provide for … Continue reading →

Categories

Archives