-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
In New Zealand Beddoe applications are governed in the first instance by the High Court Rules, which do not extend to prospective costs orders by beneficiaries. Representation of VG Trustee Limited re the B Trust (Re the B Trust) considers whether beneficiaries should have their costs met on account of a successful Beddoe application brought … Continue reading
Re Borthwick relates to an application by trustees to enter into a settlement agreement and to make the necessary variations of trust to effect the agreement. The background of the matter features a trust restructure that was challenged by a disaffected beneficiary. The application before the court calls upon the court’s supervisory capacity pursuant to section 124 … Continue reading
In Jongeneel v Schaake Powell J traverses the parameters of deadlock that would support the Court exercising powers to remove existing trustees and appoint a replacement trustee pursuant to sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019, By way of background Ms Jongeneel and Mr Schaake settled the J A G and A J … Continue reading
The key facts of Tata v Abrams are set out in [2] of the judgment as follows: … Donna and Reginald’s mother, Violet Tata (Violet), passed away on 19 March 2008. Donna was one of two executors appointed under Violet’s Will. The other executor, Ms Judy Kaka, passed away in 2016. Donna assumed responsibility for … Continue reading
Wallace v Wallace relates to a decision of the trustees of the Ione Wallace Trust (the Trust) to bring forward the Trust’s vesting date. As set out at [4]: “The trustees wish to bring forward the vesting date and distribute the funds they currently hold to the six final beneficiaries named in the Trust. One … Continue reading
The Trusts Act 2019 introduced a presumption that trustees will provide basic trust information to every beneficiary and will provide further information on request. Before doing so, trustees must consider the factors set out in section 53 of the Trusts Act. Importantly, there is a procedure in section 54 of the Trusts Act where no … Continue reading
McLauglin v McLauglin relates to claims regarding the management of a family trust and the cost consequences of the proceeds, which are significant. The background of the matter is summarised by French J, who delivered the Court of Appeal’s decision as follows: The trust that is the subject of these proceedings, the Ashely Trust (the … Continue reading
It is not uncommon for will-makers to specify the age at which beneficiaries are to benefit. The question is, if the beneficiaries have capacity, must they wait? Telford v Telford answers this question by reference to the rule in Saunders v Vautier, and more latterly section 121 of the Trusts Act 2019. By way of … Continue reading
Jones v Jones relates to matters in dispute regarding the estate of Basil Jones, in the context of a blended family. The executors of Basil Jones’ will are his surviving wife Laurel and his children from a previous relationship. Laurel made an election to pursue a claim against Basil’s estate pursuant to the Property (Relationships) … Continue reading
Cooper v Pinney is a second appeal and cross-appeal, by leave, from a decision of the Family Court that ascertained relationship and separate property following a relationship break down. At the heart of the matter was the treatment of a discretionary trust settled during the relationship to receive property by way of resettlement from a … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 