-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Since 1940, to the extent a charity’s charitable purposes are carried out in New Zealand, income derived from charitable business activities has been tax exempt. Many of New Zealand’s 29,000 registered raise funds through business activities. These activities vary in size and scope. Where tax-exempt business activities directly relate to charitable purposes, such as a … Continue reading
Churchman J’s decision in Lane v Li, which runs to 239 paragraphs over 46 pages, relates to allegations that the deceased did not have testamentary capacity when a will was made together with an allegation of undue influence. As noted at [31]: [31] The Court is also in the unusual situation of having available to … Continue reading
Refrigerant Recovery NZ Limited v the Trust for the Destruction of Synthetic Refrigerants relates to a Beddoe order application. The substantive claim challenges the validity of a trust restructure and decisions made by the former trustee’s directors to implement the restructure. The restructure was brought about to address reforms to the product stewardship schemes (one … Continue reading
Testamentary trusts arise in many circumstances and for many reasons. In Castle Trustees Limited the deceased provided for the residue of his estate to provide income for his children throughout their lives with a 1/4 share of the total residuary estate being distributed in equal shares to the grandchildren following the death of each child. … Continue reading
Settling relationship property matters where this is a trust or trusts in the mix can be problematic where the record of agreement may not correctly reflect trust owned assets. In Willis v Willis, Duffy J was of the view that an agreement that purported to be made under s 21A of the Act could not … Continue reading
This appeal to the Supreme Court addresses what rights or powers s in a family trust can properly be treated as “property” rights or interests falling within the ambit of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (the PRA). For the background see Weakly Fiduciary. The appeal was denied, the reasons for which are summarised at [125] … Continue reading
In a majority decision (Winkelmann CJ dissenting) the Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal in Legler v Formannoij. For the background to this matter see The proper corporate trustee. The key issue for decision is set out at as follows at [5] the Supreme Court decision: “It is also common ground that whether Marina’s purpose … Continue reading
Trustees are commonly also beneficiaries of family trusts. However, where sibling rivalry or other family disputes compromise the proper administration of a trust, Court assistance can be necessary to determine whether trustees have been properly removed, or whether some or all of the trustees should be removed. In Lim v Lim-Yip the Court was required … Continue reading
The Supreme Court has held that notwithstanding the fact that “The appellants were abused in a most shocking way by their father when they were children…” that “The imposition of fiduciary obligations based on peculiar vulnerability alone, untied from the analysis of, or even need for, a subsisting relationship, is inconsistent with the relationship-based analysis … Continue reading
“Retaining” the trust when a relationship ends is often not as straight-forward as the relevant parties might consider. This is highlighted in Collinson v Collinson & Co Limited where orders were sought for variation to a trust to allow the inclusion of one the settlor’s child and a any future children with his new party. … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 