//
archives

vickiammundsen

vickiammundsen has written 737 posts for Matters of Trust

Update on the Review of the Law of Trusts

A new “Trusts Reference Group” has been established by Minister of Justice Amy Adams to help update and improve the law governing private trusts. Ms Adams has stated that in a media release made on 29 May 2015 that “it’s important that trust law is fit for purpose and does not create unnecessary costs.” The Trusts Reference Group … Continue reading →

Bankrupt beneficiaries

Trusts are settled for many reasons.  While there is no one primary reason for settling a trust, creditor protection is perhaps the most commonly cited reason; perhaps because the settlor is carrying on a risky venture; perhaps because the settlor wishes to ward off the nebulous risks beneficiaries may incur. Which is all fine. But … Continue reading →

When the going gets tough – litigate and litigate and litigate …

Some cases seem to have eternal existence.  The original matter of Spence v Lynch is one of these.  The are now at least 9 recorded decisions by my count named either  White v Spence or Spence v Lynch.  The first case was written up in this blog as Dominant trustee architect of loss.  The name was apt then, … Continue reading →

Trusts and privacy

In New Zealand the Law Commission has recommended that there not be a register of trusts in New Zealand.  See Review of the Law of Trusts: A Trusts Act for New Zealand at 18.28. The Law Commission view that this is too blunt an instrument to use to improve accountability to beneficiaries. While the privacy … Continue reading →

Trustee liability

I write a lot about trustee liability.  The reason for that is simple – there is lots to write about.  Being a trustee is a risky business, and sadly many trustees are not sufficiently aware of the risks of trusteeship. For trustees or advisers who want to be better informed I have written a book … Continue reading →

Trustees cannot avoid liability through retirement

The recent Australian case Anderson v FC of T highlights the risks of trusteeship and reinforces the fact that liability already incurred as a trustee cannot be voided through the trustee’s retirement. Although the facts of the case relate in part to specific provisions of the Australian GST Act, the message to be taken from the case reinforces the importance … Continue reading →

Trustees left holding the baby

SWL Trustee Company Limited (SWL) is a trustee that acts together with two other trustees as trustees of a family trust.  As is commonly the case, two of the trustees (the instructing trustees) are also settlors of the trust.  The trust owns a number of properties.  All is fine, until it is not.  The trust owns a number of properties.  … Continue reading →

Extricating assets from a jointly settled trust

While recent headlines might lead one to belive that trusts are falling down in the face of relationship failures, closer inspection would suggest that in fact this is not commonly the case.  There appears to be a significant distinction between trusts where both spouses or partners are settlor/trustees and cases where only one spouse or partner … Continue reading →

Court approval for resettlement – a wise invesment

Dealing with trust owned assets following the demise of the settlors’ relationship can be tricky.  Many of the traps and pitfalls that can befall trustees who have diffficulties differentiating between the rights as beneficiaries and the obligations they owe as trustees are highlighted in the cases that comprise the back story to  Irvine and Taylor … Continue reading →

Debts owing by trustees “real”

When assets are transferred to a trust by a settlor the transfer is generally by way of gift or sale.  Where assets are sold there is a gift back that can be forgiven immediately, progressively or at some future date, if at all. Prior to the abolition of gift duty gifting programs were common and … Continue reading →

Categories

Archives