-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Buying the family farm can seem a rite of passage. However, given the value of most farms inter-generational assistance can be required so that this can happen. Commonly, this assistance can take the form of an on-demand loan. While not stated, the practical reality is that if the children stay in Mum and Dad’s favour, no demand … Continue reading
On 22 December 2014, Inland Revenue released draft Public Ruling PUB0209: “Income tax — whether a beneficiary will be treated as a settlor”. The Public Rulings consider whether a beneficiary of a trust who has a current account can be a “settlor” of the trust for income tax purposes under s HC 27(2)(a) or (b) of the Income Tax Act 2007. … Continue reading
When a trustee relationship breaks down, if one of the trustees holds the power of appointment, it is important that that trustee does not rely on this power to presume future control. Consider the case of Nysse v Nysse. Mr and Mrs Nysse were co-trustees of a trust settled by Mr Nysse. The trust’s assets … Continue reading
If it were a movie the title might be: “Rosebud 2 – the edifice collapses further. The case of Rosebud Corporate Trustee Limited v Bublitz focused on whether the trust for which Rosebud Corporate Trustee Limited (Rosebud) acted was a sham. As a result of the court finding the trust to be a sham an agreement that Rosebud Trust purported to … Continue reading
The dispute over Huka Lodge (see the Fight Over Huka Lodge) highlights an element of certain trust-based relationships that can be overlooked. This is the ability for subsequent trust-related disputes to survive time-barring due to the passage of time. Michael Kidd and Alexander van Heeren were former partners in a successful partnership that amassed significant wealth … Continue reading
Much is written about breach of trust, and the liability that can flow. However, a sensible question, might be, is a breach of trust always fatal? Can trustees have a go at getting it right? As it happens, yes, in some circumstances. as is demonstrated in Masters v Stewart they can. In that case, a capital distribution … Continue reading
There are a large number of charitable trusts in New Zealand. The reason for this is not well understood: see How Charitable is New Zealand for some insight. One of the issues that arises, perhaps more in New Zealand than elsewhere, due to the number of charitable trusts, is that the trustees are not always … Continue reading
Claims against trusts are on the increase the reasons for which are various and relate, in part to the number of trusts in existence in New Zealand and in part to a growing appreciation and awareness as to what options a disgruntled beneficiary, settlor, trustee or creditor might have. One area that has produced much … Continue reading
I was asked this week, in a round about way, whether trusts “still work”? The question was actually couched as to whether I was aware of any statistics about how many trusts are wound up. I am not aware of any statistics along those lines. However, from my own experience I still settle more trusts … Continue reading
The general rule is that costs follow the event, with the loser paying the winner’s costs, in whole or in part. However, the rules are less clear cut with trust-related litigation and costs remain at the court’s discretion. Accordingly, beneficiaries are often in a somewhat invidious position. Despite the accepted rights of beneficiaries, access to … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 