-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
In Jongeneel v Schaake Powell J traverses the parameters of deadlock that would support the Court exercising powers to remove existing trustees and appoint a replacement trustee pursuant to sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019, By way of background Ms Jongeneel and Mr Schaake settled the J A G and A J … Continue reading
The Trusts Act 2019 introduced a presumption that trustees will provide basic trust information to every beneficiary and will provide further information on request. Before doing so, trustees must consider the factors set out in section 53 of the Trusts Act. Importantly, there is a procedure in section 54 of the Trusts Act where no … Continue reading
Kain v Public Trust relates to an application for disclosure of a deed that brought forward the distribution date of the Te Mata Property Trust (the Trust). This deed distributed the entirety of the Trust’s assets and had the effect of terminating certain beneficial interests. The background of the matter is set out in [4] … Continue reading
It is not uncommon for will-makers to specify the age at which beneficiaries are to benefit. The question is, if the beneficiaries have capacity, must they wait? Telford v Telford answers this question by reference to the rule in Saunders v Vautier, and more latterly section 121 of the Trusts Act 2019. By way of … Continue reading
Ryan v Lobb relates to the interpretation of a resettlement clause contained in the deed of trust for the Lothbury Trust (the Trust) that expressly provided for a resettlement on written notice in the event that the Settlors separated, or their marriage was legally dissolved. Such notice was given by Ms Ryan in 2017 following … Continue reading
As noted in Re Estate of Glue section 136 of the Trusts Act 2019 provides a “broader, more flexible” determination of ‘reasonable measures’, compared to what has been described as the repealed Trustee Act’s “long and impenetrable provision.” This has been achieved by codifying a common law jurisdiction that gives the Court broad powers to … Continue reading
The Blackberry Family Settlement (the Trust) is governed by Jersey law. The matter came before the Royal Court of Jersey to establish the validity of a Deed of Retirement and Appointment of Trustees (the DoRA) that was no in accordance with the terms of the Trust, which specified who could appoint trustees in order of … Continue reading
Disclosure requests in the context of trusts, wills and estate can raise complex issues that can require the assistance of the court to resolve, particularly following the introduction of the Trusts Act 2019 and before the expected case law that will be realised in due course. However, in some cases it is simply a matter … Continue reading
The background of this matter is set out as follows in Cooke J’s judgment: In Armani v Armani Walker J considered the threshold for the appointment of a receiver in the following terms at [86]: My view is that the ordinary meaning of “reasonable necessity” does not precisely equate with a measure of “last resort” … Continue reading
Cooke v Butler, which relates amongst other things to a dispute regarding whether the sum of $100,000 paid to a beneficiary was a loan, considers the issues of common interest privilege and the practical parameters of disclosure and discovery in the context of litigation between trustees and a beneficiary. As stated at [15]: Associate Judge … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 