-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
A bare trust arises where property is held by a person (the trustee) only for the purposes to hold until transferred in accordance with the beneficiary’s directions. Bare trusts can be a commercial convenience, but can also effect a remedy in circumstances when property might otherwise be lost due to the fungible nature of the … Continue reading
The Supreme court has granted leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision in Erceg v Erceg, see A step back for beneficiaries or a nil all draw? The approved question is “Should the conclusion that disclosure not be made/required be set-aside?” References: Erceg v Erceg [2016] NZSC 69
In the Matter of the Piedmont Trust and the Riviera Trust powers of appointment and who can exercise them are an important aspect of both the management of a trust, and the very terms on which a trust is settled. It is now generally agreed that whether the powers are held by a trustee or a … Continue reading
The long-awaited decision (issued in fact as two separate decisions) in Clayton v Clayton were released today (23 March 2016). The first decision relates to the Vaughan Road Property Trust (VRPT) and the second to the Claymark Trust. Background Mr and Mrs Clayton commenced a de facto relationship in 1986 and married in 1989. They … Continue reading
Professor Frances Moran has been attributed with lecturing her mainly male equity students at King’s Inns that “There are three roads to ruin in life, wine, women and becoming a trustee. The first two are at least enjoyable.” Not wishing to enter into a debate of the relative strengths of either sex to mislead and … Continue reading
… when first we practice to deceive. The case of Marr v Parkin demonstrates the need sometimes to differentiate between transaction risk and expectation and the rights that might flow from the latter. The facts of the case are relatively straight-forward. Ms Marr’s home was subject to a mortgagee sale. She wished to retain the … Continue reading
It can be a tricky thing being a beneficiary. All those rights – but how to enforce them? The court has an inherent right to enforce trusts – can that can entitle beneficiaries to trust documents so that the beneficiaries can ensure the trust is (or is not) being properly managed. However, there are limits … Continue reading
Some cases seem to have eternal existence. The original matter of Spence v Lynch is one of these. The are now at least 9 recorded decisions by my count named either White v Spence or Spence v Lynch. The first case was written up in this blog as Dominant trustee architect of loss. The name was apt then, … Continue reading
While recent headlines might lead one to belive that trusts are falling down in the face of relationship failures, closer inspection would suggest that in fact this is not commonly the case. There appears to be a significant distinction between trusts where both spouses or partners are settlor/trustees and cases where only one spouse or partner … Continue reading
When assets are transferred to a trust by a settlor the transfer is generally by way of gift or sale. Where assets are sold there is a gift back that can be forgiven immediately, progressively or at some future date, if at all. Prior to the abolition of gift duty gifting programs were common and … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 