//
archives

Cases

This category contains 55 posts

What’s in a name?

References to executors and trustees are routinely combined and treated as synonymous with each other.  But are they?  Actually they are not.  While the distinction is often unimportant, in certain circumstances it is critical. The executor’s duties include obtaining a grant of probate, getting in all of the assets, paying outstanding (and future) debts including … Continue reading

Dis-illusion

The long awaited Court of Appeal decision on the subject of illusory trusts should make unsettling reading for many a settlor, and perhaps their advisers too. The decision, which runs to 96 pages is substantial.  The message is mixed.  While the trust in question was found to be valid (illusion it turns out, is just … Continue reading

Power of attorney does not negate terms of trust deed

Powers of attorney and deeds of delegation can be useful, especially where a trustee may be absent from New Zealand for periods of time.  However, the extent to which trustees can rely on decisions made where one trustee has acted in a personal capacity and under a power of attorney require consideration. Consider the facts in … Continue reading

Another tributary in the trickle of constructive trust cases

The decision in Judd v Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited represents another tributary in the trickle of constructive trust cases.  The facts are relatively straight-forward – trust settled after the end of the settlor’s marriage owns the family home, third wife (Ms Judd) aware of this, Ms Judd makes some direct and indirect contributions (40% was claimed, ultimate result equates … Continue reading

Going it alone

Following the end of a relationship “going it alone” is a practical reality.  However, where a trust was settled during the relationship, the extent to which one can “go it alone” needs to be carefully assessed.  This reality, and the consequences of failing to address it are highlighted in the High Court decision in Nichols … Continue reading

What’s in a name?

The Court of Appeal decision in Cowan v Martin highlights the need to clearly identify when parties are acting as trustees or the trustees’ agents.  While in this case the agency argument may seem a little contrived, and is available only because of the commonality of capacity and parties, the case remains instructive. The lessons … Continue reading

Loan debate determined

The Court of Appeal has dismissed as aspects of an appeal of a High Court decision upholding a loan between trusts following the breakdown of the borrowing trustees’ relationship.  See Trustees until divorce us do part.

Round 7 and counting

Some cases will never settle.  Stokes v Insight Legal is one of them.  In this most recent trip to the High Court the defendants (Insight Legal et al) have sought leave to appeal the High Court decision Stokes v Insight Legal [2014] NZHC 2475.  This decision was largely procedural and related to matters that had … Continue reading

Use it or lose it

When a trustee relationship breaks down, if one of the trustees holds the power of appointment, it is important that that trustee does not rely on this power to presume future control. Consider the case of Nysse v Nysse. Mr and Mrs Nysse were co-trustees of a trust settled by Mr Nysse.  The trust’s assets … Continue reading

Do it right or don’t bother?

Trusts are a bit like plants – tend them and nourish them and you can reap the rewards for years.  Leave them alone and even if once well tended to, the plant can bolt or fail.  The story that became  Murrell v Hamilton provides a sad example of what can happen when trustees fail to collectively … Continue reading

Categories

Archives