-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
It is not uncommon for will-makers to specify the age at which beneficiaries are to benefit. The question is, if the beneficiaries have capacity, must they wait? Telford v Telford answers this question by reference to the rule in Saunders v Vautier, and more latterly section 121 of the Trusts Act 2019. By way of … Continue reading
Dewart v Lal relates to an application for summary judgment to set aside a trustee resolution removing and appointing trustees of the Sanatan Dharam Trust (the Trust), a registered charity. The decision is fact specific, but nevertheless provides excellent guidance regarding the interpretation of powers of appointment and removal. When interpreting a trust deed, as … Continue reading
Ryan v Lobb relates to the interpretation of a resettlement clause contained in the deed of trust for the Lothbury Trust (the Trust) that expressly provided for a resettlement on written notice in the event that the Settlors separated, or their marriage was legally dissolved. Such notice was given by Ms Ryan in 2017 following … Continue reading
The Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal in Legler v Formannoij. For background see The proper corporate trustee and No fraud here. References:
Connolly v Eckhout traverses the application of the little known Imprisonment for Debt Limitation Act 1908 to a person acting in a fiduciary capacity. By way of background: … Ms Eckhout did not pay the judgment sum. The High Court has limited powers to issue an arrest order where requirements that are largely drawn from … Continue reading
Cooper v Pinney is a second appeal and cross-appeal, by leave, from a decision of the Family Court that ascertained relationship and separate property following a relationship break down. At the heart of the matter was the treatment of a discretionary trust settled during the relationship to receive property by way of resettlement from a … Continue reading
The most recent decision in the long-running Lambie Trustee Limited v Addleman relates to costs on account of a judgment of the Supreme Court delivered in 1 June 2021. In that judgment as noted in the case in hand at [1] “.. with one clarification, the Courtdismissed an appeal brought by Lambie Trustee Ltd (LTL). … Continue reading
The background to Duffy J’s 2022 decision in Addleman v Lambie Trustee Limited is set out at [1] and [5] as follows: For further background see It’s mine said the trustee, all mine and Disclosure request declined. The decision raises interesting procedural questions regarding the application for the appointment of a receiver when as noted … Continue reading
The background to Legler v Formannoij is set out in No fraud here. For practical purposes the relevant background is canvassed at [24] as follows: Fundamentally Legler v Formannoij considers whether the appointment of a corporate trustee of which a beneficiary is the sole director is improper. This question needs to be considered in light … Continue reading
The Blackberry Family Settlement (the Trust) is governed by Jersey law. The matter came before the Royal Court of Jersey to establish the validity of a Deed of Retirement and Appointment of Trustees (the DoRA) that was no in accordance with the terms of the Trust, which specified who could appoint trustees in order of … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 