-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
The on-going proceedings in Singh v Singh relate to the Calvary Indian Assembly of God (Calvary), which has been established as a charitable trust (the Trust) with a board of trustees who hold the Trust’s assets. Separately, Calvary is an incorporated society with a board responsible for the church’s management and organisation. At the relevant … Continue reading
Booth and Magniness v Rahal relates to a successful application for the appointment of a receiver to the First Trust (the Trust). The Trust’s original trustee was First Trust Limited (the Company). The background is set out by Gault J at [3] to [9] as follows: [3] On 28 April 2017, the Company was incorporated. … Continue reading
Scott v Chamley relates to an application for the removal of trustees and the appointment of replacement trustees. In this case it was not disputed that the former trustees should be removed and replaced. The question for the Court related to the new trustee or trustees to be appointed. The key points can be summarised … Continue reading
Trustees are commonly also beneficiaries of family trusts. However, where sibling rivalry or other family disputes compromise the proper administration of a trust, Court assistance can be necessary to determine whether trustees have been properly removed, or whether some or all of the trustees should be removed. In Lim v Lim-Yip the Court was required … Continue reading
In Queenin v Queenin the Court was asked to determine whether a trustee had been properly removed and for the court to review the exercise of appointor and trustee powers. The context of the application was the settlors’ decision to wind up the trust as the settlors did not consider the trust was still necessary. … Continue reading
Cain v Martin relates to wide ranging proceedings regarding the proper administration of the Tolemac Trust following several years of disharmony following the settlor’s death. The most recent proceedings relate to the removal of one of the two trustees due to concerns regarding proper disclosure regarding trust assets and an unauthorised distribution to a trustee … Continue reading
In New Zealand Beddoe applications are governed in the first instance by the High Court Rules, which do not extend to prospective costs orders by beneficiaries. Representation of VG Trustee Limited re the B Trust (Re the B Trust) considers whether beneficiaries should have their costs met on account of a successful Beddoe application brought … Continue reading
In Jongeneel v Schaake Powell J traverses the parameters of deadlock that would support the Court exercising powers to remove existing trustees and appoint a replacement trustee pursuant to sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019, By way of background Ms Jongeneel and Mr Schaake settled the J A G and A J … Continue reading
The key facts of Tata v Abrams are set out in [2] of the judgment as follows: … Donna and Reginald’s mother, Violet Tata (Violet), passed away on 19 March 2008. Donna was one of two executors appointed under Violet’s Will. The other executor, Ms Judy Kaka, passed away in 2016. Donna assumed responsibility for … Continue reading
The Trusts Act 2019 introduced a presumption that trustees will provide basic trust information to every beneficiary and will provide further information on request. Before doing so, trustees must consider the factors set out in section 53 of the Trusts Act. Importantly, there is a procedure in section 54 of the Trusts Act where no … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 