-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
In Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part I when Prince Hal finds the cowardly Falstaff pretending to be dead on the battlefield, the prince assumes he has been killed. After the prince leaves the stage, Falstaff rationalizes “The better part of Valour, is Discretion; in the which better part, I haue saued my life” (spelling and punctuation … Continue reading
Family trusts can generally run for up to 80 years. That puts quite an onus on the settlor to get it right. It also means that where beneficiaries are defined by reference to children and grandchildren there can be a significant number of beneficiaries over time. Jones & Ors as Trustees v Collings & Ors there … Continue reading
Beneficiaries of a trust – including a testamentary trust are entitled to information relating to the trust. In the Goodman v Campbell a minor beneficiary’s mother sought appointment as a litigation guardian following an executor’s refusal to provide information about the estate of which her minor son was the sole beneficiary. The trustee of the … Continue reading
When who stopped loving who first is lost to the antiquities of time, for modern lovers there is still the trust to keep them shackled together. And what a shackle, and what expense… Whittle v Whittle is another tale of love lost but the Trust, if not the trust, remaining. In this case the pesky … Continue reading
A bare trust is a trust where the trustee’s only duties are to hold the trust property, take reasonable care of it; and transfer the property to or as directed by the trust’s beneficiary. The duties of a bare trustee are passive (unlike the “normal” position where trustees have positive duties to manage and exercise their … Continue reading
The following article by Michael Parker, Andrew O’Bryan, Frank Hinoporos, Emma Woolley and William Moore from Hall & Wilcox highlights the importance of knowing who the trustees and beneficiaries of Australian trusts are. While the duty applies in an Australian context it can have relevance to New Zealanders who may be looking at purchasing real estate … Continue reading
The role of executor of an estate and the on-going responsibilities and obligations are not always well understood. Where there is a legal advisor the executor may be well schooled in the relevant obligations and the administration of the estate can be expected to proceed in a timely and proper manner. However, sometimes this is not … Continue reading
The decision in Adlam v Savage, which relates to a breach do trust is a hard read. However, it is worth persevering to appreciate the practical issues associated with the remedies available when a trustee profits from a trust or fiduciary relationship. In Adlam v Savage Ms Adlam received over $14 million from exploiting knowledge … Continue reading
… when first we practice to deceive. The case of Marr v Parkin demonstrates the need sometimes to differentiate between transaction risk and expectation and the rights that might flow from the latter. The facts of the case are relatively straight-forward. Ms Marr’s home was subject to a mortgagee sale. She wished to retain the … Continue reading
Testamentary capacity is relatively well traversed and understood and the principles set out in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549, which has endured the passage of time, remain the leading authority on testamentary capacity. The following statement from p. 567 of that judgment succinctly observes the elements of testamentary capacity: “As to the … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 