//
archives

Trusts

This category contains 279 posts

Result of resulting trust argument unjust but correct

Caveats can be useful for preventing property being transferred when it might defeat the caveators real ability to recover a debt owing or the due return on an unregistered property interest. However, to maintain a caveat it is necessary to show not only a debt or interest, but also how this debt or interest is connected to … Continue reading

If you can’t play nicely …

It is fundamental to the role of a trustee that the trustee must act in the best interests of all of the beneficiairies.  This obligation can be sorely tested when the trustees are separated spouses or partners.  Many do not pass the test. When trustees cannot work together the prudent course of action is for … Continue reading

Contracting with trustees, all of the trustees

The facts ma’am, nothing but the facts.  When the facts relate to a contract with trustees, the proposition becomes the trustees ma’am – nothing less than all the trustees. Trusts are not legal entities.  Regardless I commonly see contracts between the A Trust and another contracting party.  This is a dangerous practice because how is … Continue reading

Time to let go

Settling a trust together seems to be the obvious next step for so many couples.  Once upon a time it was monogrammed towels.  Now it’s seeing your name on a trust deed.  But when the going gets tough the reality is, dividing linen is much easier than dealing with a trust.  One of the reasons … Continue reading

No sham decision upheld

The Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal (upholding the High Court decision) in Glover v Glover where the court found that a ruse was not a sham.  Briefly a bare trust arrangement entered into to avoid a tax impost was found to have achieved its object and accordingly … Continue reading

High cost of failed argument

The common intention constructive trust is a rare beast.  When trying to make such an argument it is essential to have the facts right as demonstrated in the decision in Ridge v Parore (Common Intention Constructive Trust, or not).  The cost of getting the argument wrong in an argument that the court described as “doomed … Continue reading

You go, no you go

Trustees do not always get on as well as is necessary to do the job of being a trustee.  Friction in the trustee relationship can arise for many reasons, often, but not always, the friction relates to the break down of a family relationship. When trustees cannot get on the issue to be determined is … Continue reading

Diminution of charity

New Zealand has an extraordinary number of family trusts.  This love affair with trusts, perhaps not surprisingly, is not limited to family trusts and is mirrored in the number of charitable trusts.  One issue with the number of charitable trusts is the fragmentation of potential resources and how these can be diminished through administration, legal … Continue reading

Common intention constructive trust deconstructed

The common intention constructive trust is a rare beast.  Its remedial potential had a brief moment of sun until the Court of Appeal delivered its decision in Harvey v Beveridge. The facts of Harvey v Beveridge can be summarised as follows: Mr Beveridge was befriended by Dr Byrd who provided him with a home in a … Continue reading

Common intention constructive trust, or not …

The common intention constructive trust is the hot and hip new remedy in the arsenal of the savvy trust lawyer.  So perhaps it is not surprising that when A lister Sally Ridge fell out with her equally sociable partner that such a claim might be made.  The genesis of the claim derived from some restructuring … Continue reading

Categories

Archives