-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
The current decision in the long-running case of Addleman v Lambie Trustee Limited & Ors relates primarily to whether the Court should order that the parties attend mediation pursuant to section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019. An appendix to the above decision (copied below) sets out a summary of Mrs Addleman’s concerns regarding the … Continue reading
In Gallagher-Dekker v Gallagher Anderson J carefully traverses the matters the Court will take into consideration when deciding whether trustees of a testamentary trust should be removed and replaced with a professional trustee. By way of background: Sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019 provide that the Court may remove a trustee and/or … Continue reading
As noted at [91] in Gatfield v Hinton: By way of wider observation in Gatfield v Hinton, Associate Judge Lester traverses the matters that will be taken into consideration when the Court is considering whether a matter should be referred to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) pursuant to section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019. Relevantly … Continue reading
Sections 126 and 127 of the Trusts Act provide for the review of trustee decisions. The scope and relevant procedure are as follows: As noted by Churchman J in Paton v Acropolis Holdings Limited[1]at [54] the review of a trustee decision is a two stage process: As noted in Paton v Acropolis Holdings Limited at … Continue reading
Re Candida Trust provides practical guidance as to the scope of section 125 of the Trusts Act 2019 and the use of the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to permit trustees to sign a new restated trust deed that incorporates varied terms. Background facts Waiver pursuant to section 125 of the Trusts Act As set out … Continue reading
The background facts of NZ Trust Corporation Ltd v Bonnard Lawson Geneve SA & Ors are set out by Associate Judge Gardiner at [1] to [4] as follows: The issues for the Court to determined can be summarised as whether: The following time-line sets out key events that have lead to the proceedings before the … Continue reading
In New Zealand Beddoe applications are governed in the first instance by the High Court Rules, which do not extend to prospective costs orders by beneficiaries. Representation of VG Trustee Limited re the B Trust (Re the B Trust) considers whether beneficiaries should have their costs met on account of a successful Beddoe application brought … Continue reading
The Supreme Court has denied leave to appeal the Court of Appeal decision in McLaughlin v McLaughlin, which relates to a long-standing challenge regarding the trusteeship of a family trust and allegations of breaches of trust brought by brothers of one of the trustees. The original causes of action were: John McLaughlin retired before the conclusion … Continue reading
Worksafe New Zealand MHI Haumaru Aotearoa v RH & Jury Trust & Ors (Worksafe v Jury) relates to a tragic and fatal accident where a young child visiting his grandfather at work on a dairy farm died after his jacket was caught in an exposed rotating shaft. As noted at [4]: Fundamentally, Worksafe v Jury … Continue reading
Re Borthwick relates to an application by trustees to enter into a settlement agreement and to make the necessary variations of trust to effect the agreement. The background of the matter features a trust restructure that was challenged by a disaffected beneficiary. The application before the court calls upon the court’s supervisory capacity pursuant to section 124 … Continue reading
Matters of Trust 