//
archives

Trusts Act

This category contains 37 posts

Receiver appointed to a trust with no trustee

Booth and Magniness v Rahal relates to a successful application for the appointment of a receiver to the First Trust (the Trust). The Trust’s original trustee was First Trust Limited (the Company). The background is set out by Gault J at [3] to [9] as follows: [3] On 28 April 2017, the Company was incorporated. … Continue reading

“Keeping” the trust

“Retaining” the trust when a relationship ends is often not as straight-forward as the relevant parties might consider. This is highlighted in Collinson v Collinson & Co Limited where orders were sought for variation to a trust to allow the inclusion of one the settlor’s child and a any future children with his new party. … Continue reading

Originating considerations

The decisions in Francis v Fishbowl Trustee Stanley Limited both include applications for leave to commence proceedings by originating application. In Francis v Fishbowl, where the substantive proceedings relate to the appointment of a receiver under section 138 of the Trusts Act 2019 the application was not granted. The background to this matter is expressed … Continue reading

Spirit of will not binding on trustees

Sherwin v JKA Holdings Limited & Ors relates to the Douglas Hilton Family Trust (the Trust), which was settled in 1985 by Dr Douglas Sherwin’s mother on terms that infer that Dr Sherwin, who was the source of the trust’s economic wealth, was the true settlor. This is addressed by Becroft J at [15] as … Continue reading

All power to the settlors

In Queenin v Queenin the Court was asked to determine whether a trustee had been properly removed and for the court to review the exercise of appointor and trustee powers. The context of the application was the settlors’ decision to wind up the trust as the settlors did not consider the trust was still necessary. … Continue reading

Honest reckoning

The current decision in the long-running case of Addleman v Lambie Trustee Limited & Ors relates primarily to whether the Court should order that the parties attend mediation pursuant to section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019. An appendix to the above decision (copied below) sets out a summary of Mrs Addleman’s concerns regarding the … Continue reading

Necessary or desirable to remove trustees

In Gallagher-Dekker v Gallagher Anderson J carefully traverses the matters the Court will take into consideration when deciding whether trustees of a testamentary trust should be removed and replaced with a professional trustee. By way of background: Sections 112 and 114 of the Trusts Act 2019 provide that the Court may remove a trustee and/or … Continue reading

New is not a reason not to…

As noted at [91] in Gatfield v Hinton: By way of wider observation in Gatfield v Hinton, Associate Judge Lester traverses the matters that will be taken into consideration when the Court is considering whether a matter should be referred to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) pursuant to section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019. Relevantly … Continue reading

Two step process to review trustee decision

Sections 126 and 127 of the Trusts Act provide for the review of trustee decisions.   The scope and relevant procedure are as follows: As noted by Churchman J in Paton v Acropolis Holdings Limited[1]at [54] the review of a trustee decision is a two stage process: As noted in Paton v Acropolis Holdings Limited at … Continue reading

ADR guidance

In Wiggins v Wiggins the court explores the parameters of section 145 of the Trusts Act, which provide that the Court, may, at the request of a Trustee or a beneficiary or on its own motion, submit any internal matter to an ADR process other than in the situation where the terms of the Trust … Continue reading

Categories

Archives